abare.gov.au - australian commodities – march quarter . volume 15 . number 1 2008

farm financial performance

australian farm income and drought recovery, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08

Financial performance of broadacre and dairy farms is expected to strengthen in 2007-08 following the lowest incomes since 1992-93 in the previous year.

Increased grain and livestock production, combined with higher commodity prices, are projected to boost farm cash incomes in
2007-08.

Incomes in the wool industry are projected to increase threefold to more than $93 000 in 2007-08, the highest income recorded in real terms since 1987-88.

Strong cash flows leading into 2007-08, combined with a recovery in grains receipts, are expected to enable most producers to rebuild livestock numbers and reduce debt.

The financial performance of Australian farms fell sharply in 2006-07 as severe drought across most of southern Australia led to a significant reduction in farm production and incomes. As seasonal conditions deteriorated throughout the season there were widespread crop failures and many grain producers realised below average yields. Livestock producers turned off animals in response to a reduction in pasture availability and an increase in feed grain and fodder costs. Significant depletions of soil moisture and some of the lowest water storage levels on record resulted in summer crop production falling by more than 50 per cent.

Favourable rainfall in autumn 2007 across the majority of winter cropping areas encouraged many producers to increase their area sown to winter crops. However, with the exception of Queensland, pockets of northern New South Wales and southern Western Australia, seasonal conditions again deteriorated over the critical September–October period. With little rainfall and protracted above average temperatures, crop yields fell significantly and some areas experienced a second year of crop failure. Despite these losses, some producers were able to cut their winter crops for hay, helping them to recoup some planting costs. Overall, winter crop production in 2007-08 was generally higher than production in 2006-07, with the exception of New South Wales.

Livestock were also affected by the deterioration in seasonal conditions, with farmers continuing to reduce stock numbers in the first quarter of 2007-08. Increased yardings of cattle, sheep and lambs during spring 2007 led to lower saleyard prices and, consequently, reduced cash receipts and incomes on properties with livestock. However, improved conditions since spring have enabled many producers to reduce turnoff and commence rebuilding animal numbers.

financial performance of australian farms

Each year abare interviews producers from the broadacre and dairy sectors of Australian agriculture as part of its survey program. The information collected provides a basis for analysing the current financial position of farmers in these industries and expected changes in the short term. Data from abare’s Australian agricultural and grazing industries survey and dairy industry survey are used in this analysis to gain insights into the performance of Australian broadacre and dairy farms over the period from 2005-06, including projected farm financial performance in 2007-08 (table 1).

farm production

Good rains during the start of the 2007-08 winter cropping season resulted in increased plantings of winter grains. Subsequent to planting, however, conditions in many parts of Australia’s grain belt turned hot and dry during late winter and much of spring. The adverse conditions constrained crop development and resulted in widespread crop failures. Reflecting this, winter grain yields are estimated to have been below average, but still higher than in 2006-07. Prospects for the 2007-08 summer crops are favourable, with good summer rains projected to boost both the area sown and yields.

The total quantity of grain and hay sold in 2007-08 is projected to increase by less than production, with many producers — particularly farms with livestock — appearing to be replenishing on-farm stocks of grains and hay. However, changes in the seasonal outlook and market conditions over the remainder of 2007-08 could result in producers selling more grain than indicated at the time of the survey.

Improved seasonal conditions since spring in much of Australia’s agricultural zone are also projected to result in a marked increase in the quantity and quality of pasture production in 2007-08. Many producers expect to reduce livestock turnoff in response to the improvement in seasonal conditions. Broadacre producers are projected to increase the numbers of both sheep and cattle in 2007-08, mainly through natural increase rather than purchasing additional animals.

box 1

major financial performance indicators

farm cash income = total cash receipts – total cash costs

total revenues received by the farm business during the financial year

payments made by the farm business for materials and services and for permanent and casual hired labour (excluding owner manager, partner and family labour)

farm business profit = farm cash in
come + changes in trading stock – depreciation – imputed labour costs

(return produced by all the
| resources used in the farm business)

rate of return = profit at full equity total opening capital x 100

(return to all capital used)

off-farm income = wages off-farm + other business income + investment + social welfare payments

(owner manager and spouse only)

farm receipts

In 2007-08, average total cash receipts for broadacre farms are projected to be similar to the previous year, as higher cropping receipts are expected to be offset by lower livestock receipts. The effect on farm receipts of producers retaining grain is projected to be partially offset by further increases in grain and oilseed prices, largely because of strong international demand and tightening global stocks. As a consequence, average total crop receipts are projected to rise by around 16 per cent in 2007-08 (figure a).

Total livestock receipts — including sheep, lambs, beef cattle and wool — are projected to fall, on average, by 5 per cent in 2007-08, mainly because of a projected fall in beef cattle receipts (figure a). Receipts from the sale of sheep, lambs and wool are projected to increase as a result of higher commodity prices.

farm costs

In 2007-08, total cash costs are projected to fall by around 13 per cent on average, as improved seasonal conditions result in reduced purchases of livestock, fodder and agistment. Outlays on cropping inputs such as fertilisers and chemicals are also projected to fall in 2007-08. The dry winter and spring conditions are likely to have suppressed weed and insect populations, reducing producers’ reliance on chemicals.

Also, in some cases the fertilisers intended for application to failed crops during the drought in 2006-07 may not have been used or leached out of the top soils, enabling producers to sow crops with reduced fertiliser application rates in 2007-08. Fertiliser application rates may also have been reduced as a result of suppliers having difficulties importing fertilisers leading up to the sowing of the 2007-08 winter crops, or in response to sharp price increases.

Interest payments are also projected to fall in 2007-08 as increased cash flows resulting from the recovery in grain production are expected to enable many broadacre producers to reduce farm business debt.

farm incomes and profits

Farm financial performance is projected to strengthen markedly in 2007-08, after broadacre producers recorded their lowest incomes since 1992-93 in the previous year (figure b). In 2006-07, farm incomes were adversely affected by extensive drought that cut farm receipts and increased production costs.

Increased grain and livestock production, combined with favourable commodity prices, are projected to result in farm cash incomes on broadacre farms nearly doubling in 2007-08, to average around $78 200 per farm (figure b, table 1).

Farm cash income is a measure of the cash funds available for farm investment and consumption after paying all costs incurred in production, including interest payments, but excluding capital payments and payments to family workers. It is a measure of short term farm performance because it does not take into account depreciation or changes in farm inventories. A measure of longer term profitability that takes into account capital depreciation and changes in inventories of livestock, fodder, grain and wool is farm business profit.

Average farm business profit in the broadacre industries is projected to recover more strongly in 2007-08 than the increase in farm cash income. This largely reflects a buildup in the value of trading stocks as a result of producers increasing livestock numbers and replenishing on-farm inventories of fodder, grain and, to a lesser extent, wool. In 2007-08, fewer broadacre farms are projected to realise a farm business loss, and of those that do, the losses are likely to be smaller than in 2006-07 (figure c). On average, farm businesses are projected to realise a profit of $11 900, compared with a loss of almost $50 000 in 2006-07.

rate of return

Rates of return to total farm capital (including capital appreciation) have been relatively high since 2000-01 (figure d). Strong demand for rural land during this period resulted in a sharp increase in land values in many agricultural regions, raising the total capital value of farms. Rising farm capital values have resulted in high rates of return including capital appreciation. Rates of return excluding capital appreciation have been adversely affected in many regions by a number of poor profit years resulting from below average seasonal conditions. With farm business profit projected to strengthen in most regions in 2007-08 (map 1), rates of return excluding capital appreciation are expected to be the highest since 2003-04 (figure d).

performance, by state

Broadacre farm cash incomes are projected to recover in 2007-08 in all states, except New South Wales, as a result of the combined effects of higher commodity prices and increased production (tables 2 and 3). Adverse seasonal conditions in New South Wales during winter and spring in 2007 are projected to have adversely affected crop production and forced many producers to continue to reduce animal numbers. Consequently, farm cash incomes in New South Wales are projected to deteriorate further to average around $13 000 a farm, 27 per cent lower than in 2006-07.

The largest increase in incomes, in both percentage and absolute terms, is projected to occur in the Northern Territory (table 2). An increase in cattle numbers in 2006-07, combined with improved seasonal conditions is projected to result in increased calf production in 2007-08. The consequent increase in cattle sales is projected to boost farm receipts, on average, by 62 per cent to around $2.5 million. Total cash costs are projected to rise by around 18 per cent to average $1.8 million a farm as increased spending on interest, contracts, freight and fodder are offset by reduced spending on livestock purchases.

Average farm business profits in the Northern Territory are projected to fall by around 27 per cent in 2007-08, as higher incomes are partly offset by a fall in the value of trading stocks and higher depreciation and imputed family labour costs (table 3). This compares with an increase in average farm business profits in 2006-07, up by an estimated 47 per cent, as increases in cattle numbers boosted the value of trading stocks by almost $825 000 per farm in that year.

With the exception of New South Wales and Tasmania, broadacre farm businesses in all states are projected to realise profits on average in 2007-08, after making significant losses in 2006-07. In Tasmania, average business losses are projected to be smaller in 2007-08, as higher commodity prices offset the impact of reduced livestock and grain production as drought conditions intensified during 2007. On average, broadacre producers in New South Wales are projected to record a farm business loss of $86 800 per farm in 2007-08, as a result of lower incomes and reduced trading stocks.

performance, by industry

Summary information on financial performance in the Australian broadacre and dairy industries for 2005-06 to 2007-08 is given in table 4 and figures e and f, while detailed projections are provided in table 4.

For the purposes of survey design, analysis and data presentation, abare uses the Australian and New Zealand Standard Industry Classification of industry type (ANZSIC). Many Australian broadacre farms are mixed enterprises combining grain growing, sheep or beef cattle. The following discussion of grains, sheep, beef and dairy farms uses information for ANZSIC industry types substantially involved in the production of these commodities (box 2).

box 2

broadacre industries

wheat and other crops industry
The wheat and other crops industry represents the more specialised producers of cereal grains, coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds. While cropping is the main enterprise undertaken, many producers in the wheat and other crops industry also have some involvement in the livestock industries.

mixed livestock–crops industry
The mixed livestock–crops industry covers farms engaged in the production of sheep and/or beef cattle in conjunction with substantial activity in broadacre crops such as wheat, coarse grains, oilseeds and pulses.

sheep industry
The sheep industry represents the more specialised producers of sheep and wool. However, the number of properties classified to the industry, along with the industry’s contribution to wool production, has declined substantially since the early 1990s as producers diversified enterprises. Currently, sheep industry farms account for only around a third of Australia’s wool production. The majority of both wool and sheep meat production occurs on mixed enterprise farms, particularly on mixed livestock– crops industry farms.

sheep–beef industry The sheep–beef industry covers properties engaged in running sheep and beef cattle. As for the sheep and beef industries, this industry also contains a large number of small farms.

beef industry
The beef industry covers properties engaged mainly in running beef cattle and accounts for around 60 per cent of Australia’s beef production. The beef industry contains a large number of small farms.

abare’s annual Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industry Survey and Australian Dairy Industry Survey only include farms above a minimum size threshold to exclude non-commercial businesses. This size threshold is based on the estimated value of agricultural operations (EVAO) as calculated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

abare has periodically changed the EVAO cutoff over the life of the AAGIS and ADIS. In the 2005-06 collection abare raised the EVAO cutoff from $22 500 to $40 000. Prior to this change, the last time the EVAO cutoff was changed was for the collection of data for 1991-92 when it was lifted from $20 000 to $22 500. It was kept at that level in nominal terms until the 2005-06 collection.

wheat and other crops farms

In 2006-07, farm cash incomes in the wheat and other crops industry fell by around 28 per cent as adverse seasonal conditions in much of the grain belt restricted winter crop plantings and production (figure e). In addition, poor pasture growth restricted feed availability and resulted in many producers using on-farm stocks of grain and hay, reducing income from sales of grain and hay. The impact of reduced sales volumes on incomes was partially offset by a sharp increase in farm gate prices as a result of reduced supplies, stronger domestic feed demand and higher international prices.

The recovery in grain production in 2007-08 is projected to have a particularly strong impact on incomes for producers in the wheat and other crops industry. Incomes in the grains industry are projected to rise on average by around 31 per cent as improved seasonal conditions in many regions will boost grain production (figure e). However, total farm cash receipts are projected to remain similar to 2006-07 as increases in receipts from crops are expected to be offset by lower livestock receipts. Livestock receipts are expected to fall as a result of reduced wool and beef cattle sales on wheat and other crops farms. In 2007-08, farm cash costs are projected to fall, on average, by 8 per cent as a result of reduced outlays on livestock purchases, fodder and interest payments.

sheep farms

Farm cash incomes in the sheep industry fell by around 11 per cent on average in 2006-07, as higher cash costs more than outweighed a small increase in cash receipts (figure e). Production costs are estimated to have risen as many producers increased purchases of fodder and agistment in the face of tightening on-farm stocks of feed grains and fodder. Also, interest payments rose significantly as producers increased debt levels in response to tightening cash flows and interest rates were increased. Total cash receipts rose slightly as increased wool sales and prices more than offset the impact of reduced crop production.

In 2007-08, farm cash incomes in the sheep industry are projected to increase threefold to more than $93 000 per farm, the highest income recorded in real terms since 1987-88 (figure e). Total cash receipts are projected to rise, on average, by around 22 per cent as improved seasonal conditions boost cropping and livestock production. In addition, improved pasture production is expected to contribute to improved product quality, enabling producers to target higher value markets and achieve higher average prices. Wool receipts are also projected to rise as a result of higher wool prices.

Improved seasonal conditions are also expected to enable some sheep industry producers to increase plantings of winter crops such as wheat, barley and oats. Increased production and higher prices are projected to boost cropping receipts on sheep industry farms by around 47 per cent. Crop receipts are projected to account for nearly 21 per cent of the sheep industry receipts in 2007-08, compared with 17 per cent in 2006-07.

In 2007-08, farm cash costs are projected to fall by around 8 per cent as improved seasonal conditions contribute to reduced purchases of fodder and livestock. Interest payments are also projected to fall as producers use the strong increase in cash flows to reduce debt levels. However, outlays on cropping inputs such as fertilisers and chemicals are projected to rise as a result of increased plantings of grain.

beef farms

In 2006-07, farm cash incomes in the beef industry deteriorated markedly as drought conditions reduced both farm production and receipts and contributed to increased production costs (figure e). Total cash receipts fell, on average, by around 11 per cent in 2006-07 as a result of reduced calf production and lower numbers of cattle being sold. The impact of reduced sales on receipts was exacerbated by lower prices, which was caused by the combined affected of increased drought related turnoff and many producers turning off more unfinished or younger animals.

Farm cash costs rose, on average, by around 2 per cent as many producers increased purchases of fodder in response to reduced on farm feed availability. In addition, interest payments increased significantly as a result of increased debt levels and higher interest rates.

Improved seasonal conditions in 2007-08 are projected to result in a reduction in cattle turn-off as farmers retain livestock in order to rebuild cattle numbers. As a result of reduced cattle sales, farm cash receipts are projected to fall by 17 per cent to average around $237 000 per farm.

Reduced outlays on fodder and livestock purchases are projected to result in total cash costs falling by around 19 per cent. As a consequence, average farm cash income in the beef industry is projected to fall by around 8 per cent to almost $37 000 (figure e). However, a significant increase in the value of trading stocks, because of a buildup in livestock numbers, is projected to boost farm business profits to almost $30 000 a farm in 2007-08, following an average business loss in 2006-07.

dairy industry

Relatively high farm gate milk prices are projected to have resulted in a strong recovery in dairy farm incomes in 2007-08 (figure f). Nevertheless, incomes in some dairy regions have continued to be affected by drought, low or zero water allocations and high feed prices.

As seasonal conditions deteriorated in 2006-07, average milk yields per cow declined by around 5 per cent. Consequently average milk receipts per farm, and hence total cash receipts, are estimated to have fallen by around 7 per cent in 2006-07. With significant increases in the prices and quantity of purchased fodder and feed grains, total cash costs rose by more than 7 per cent in 2006-07. As a result of lower cash receipts and higher cash costs, farm cash income for Australian dairy farmers is estimated to have declined by 61 per cent to $34 600 in 2006-07.

The continuation of poor seasonal conditions in some dairy regions is projected to reduce the average Australian dairy herd by around 20 head per farm in 2007-08, with milk production per farm projected to decline by around 6 per cent. However, total milk receipts and average milk yield per cow are projected to increase by around 34 per cent and 4 per cent respectively, leading to a projected increase in total cash receipts of around 26 per cent. With fodder expenditure remaining high in historical terms, average cash costs are projected to fall only slightly in 2007-08.

Consequently, average farm cash income and farm business profit are projected to improve substantially in all states in 2007-08 from the lows recorded in 2006-07. Reflecting these changes, the proportion of dairy farms recording negative farm business profit is projected to decline from an estimated 76 per cent in 2006-07 to around 43 per cent in 2007-08 (figure g).

recovering from drought

New investments are an important means of boosting farm productivity and incomes, with productivity growth providing better prospects for farm business viability in the longer term. From the mid-1990s through to 2001-02 there was a general increase in the proportion of broadacre and dairy farms acquiring land and expanding the scale of their farm operations because of high farm incomes (figure h). Since the drought in 2002-03, there has been greater variability in the proportion of farms expanding.

New investment in plant, machinery, vehicles and improvements has been sustained at historically high levels during the 2000s, despite droughts in 2002-03 and 2006-07 reducing incomes. Average net investment per farm in 2006-07 was around 13 per cent lower than in 2005-06, but still more than 50 per cent above the average annual investment undertaken during the 1990s (figure i).

Provided these investments are well directed and contribute to further productivity growth and income generating capacity in the future, this level of investment in the broadacre and dairy industries should be positive for overall farm viability once seasonal conditions improve.

financing farm expansion and capital investment

The rising proportion of farms purchasing additional land during the late-1990s and early 2000s was accompanied by a steady increase in average farm debt. The major part of these increases in debt was to fund new farm investments. However, rising land prices and lower incomes as a result of drought, has reduced investment in land purchases. Since 2002-03, there has been an increase in working capital debt as farms have dealt with the impacts of several droughts (figure j).

Although average farm debt has increased in real terms since the mid-1990s, broadacre and dairy farmers have been able to maintain their equity in the farm business at around 85 per cent because of increasing land values (figure k). Rising land values in recent years have not only supported high equity levels, but have also led to very high average rates of return to total farm capital in most regions when capital appreciation is included.

Recent increases in land values have been driven by strong demand for land in general rather than sustained improvement in farm returns. Some of the key factors affecting changes in demand for agricultural land in various regions include changes in population growth, urban and peri-urban developments, and strong economic growth in those regions that are heavily influenced by mining developments.

financing the recovery from drought

With an improvement in seasonal conditions in 2007-08, many broadacre producers began using a variety of funding sources to finance increases in production. The major sources of such funding include the business’ cash flow, debt facilities, liquid assets and off-farm incomes. The following sections explore how producers intend to use some of these funding alternatives in order to manage their continued recovery from drought.

use of liquid assets

Farm management deposits have become an important liquid asset available to primary producers over the past decade. The Farm Management Deposit (FMD) scheme established in 1999 is a tax linked, financial risk management tool, aimed at helping primary producers deal more effectively with fluctuations in cash flow caused by climatic variations and changes in market prices.

By placing funds in an FMD account, farmers are taking out an option to later find a tax deduction to offset quarantined income (Levantis and Martin 2007). In recent years there has been a distinct seasonality in the pattern of deposits, with a significant net inflow of funds in the June quarter and a corresponding large outflow in the September quarter of each year (figure l). This suggests that some producers are using their FMD accounts as a tax minimisation tool rather than as the risk and financial management tool intended by the Australian Government.

farm business debt

Farm business debt estimates have been provided exclusive of debt that is underwritten, including harvest loan and dairy structural adjustment advances. Inclusion of harvest loans in estimates of farm business debt can result in falls in farm debt for grain producing farms in drought years as crop production is reduced, masking the increases in working capital debt that often occur at these times. Conversely, debt increases in years of high crop production when cash flow is also high. Harvest loans and dairy structural adjustment payments are reported separately in the tables.

use of debt

In order to better understand the influence of the 2006-07 drought on producer debt servicing capacity and the financial position they entered in 2007-08, a classification based on the combination of equity and cash flow has been developed to reflect the average equity position of farms. Farms are separated into one of four groups according to whether their equity ratio is above or below 70 per cent, and whether their farm cash income is positive or negative. The results are presented in figure m.

Figure m shows that the average equity position of Australian broadacre farms as they entered the 2006-07 drought was good, with the proportion of farms with equity ratios in excess of 70 per cent at its highest level in three decades. This has largely been driven by a significant increase in land prices in most regions over the last decade. In 2006-07, the proportion of broadacre and dairy producers with low equity increased to around 15 per cent. Of these producers, about a third, or just 5 per cent of all broadacre and dairy producers, had low equity and negative cash flows in 2006-07.

In 2007-08, abare’s projections survey indicates that, on average, farm debt in the Australian broadacre and dairy industries is expected to decrease. However, producers with low equity or negative incomes may have more difficulty accessing working capital debt facilities, forcing them to rely heavily on their businesses ability to generate surplus cash flows in order to finance their recovery in 2007-08. In order to gain insights into this, the 2006-07 ranking of farms according to their equity/income positions was applied to those farms participating in abare’s 2007-08 projections survey (table 7).

During 2007-08, producers with low equity and negative incomes in 2006-07 achieved a significant improvement in farm cash flows. While some of this recovery was generated by an improvement in grain production, it was also the result of continued high rates of livestock turnoff. While the improved cash flows are projected to enable these producers to reduce debt levels, it has been achieved via a significant reduction in animal numbers and reduced livestock production potential in 2008-09. Without access to debt facilities, these producers may struggle to improve their farms’ viability in coming years.

However, for the majority of broadacre and dairy producers, who either have high equity or strong cash flows, 2007-08 is projected to be a year of recovery. Strong cash flows leading into 2007-08, combined with the recovery in grains sales, is expected to enable most producers to rebuild livestock numbers and reduce debt levels. If seasonal conditions permit, the majority of Australia’s broadacre and dairy producers are in a strong position to expand production and enhance profitability in 2008-09.

for references, please refer to page 264 of the pdf.

2	financial performance , by state, broadacre industries average per farm

farm cash income

farm business profit a

rate of return b

2005-06

2006-07 p

2007-08 s

2005-06

2006-07 p

2007-08 s

2005-06

2006-07 p

2007-08 s

new south wales

63 975

17 750

13 000

– 6 669

– 82 220

– 86 800

0.7

–1.5

–1.9

victoria

55 374

39 240

69 000

– 5 755

– 50 920

16 800

0.7

–1.2

1.2

queensland

99 329

44 130

107 600

– 5 910

– 7 030

134 700

0.8

0.9

3.4

western australia

70 911

98 090

169 700

– 24 215

– 25 960

55 900

0.7

0.9

2.4

south australia

58 942

47 380

124 900

– 13 644

– 63 230

39 800

0.5

–1.1

2.3

tasmania

70 856

11 020

21 300

14 783

– 54 920

– 46 400

1.3

–0.9

northern territory

537 017

33 620

717 700

480 591

705 910

513 500

4.5

6.1

3.6

australia

70 182

41 180

78 200

– 7 745

– 49 610

11 900

0.8

–0.4

1.2

a Defined as farm cash income plus buildup in trading stocks, less depreciation and the imputed value of operator partner and family labor. b Defined as profit at full equity, excluding capital appreciation, as a percentage of total opening capital. Profit at full equity is defined as farm business profit plus rent, interest and lease payments less depreciation on leased items. p Preliminary. s Provisional estimate.

3	financial performance, by state, all broadacre industries average per farm

new south wales

victoria

2005–06

2006–07 p

2007–08 s

2005–06

2006–07 p

2007–08 s

total cash receipts

304 871

255 070

(5)

208 900

255 017

199 550

(5)

228 400

total cash costs

240 896

237 320

(5)

195 900

199 644

160 310

(5)

159 500

farm cash income

63 975

17 750

(42)

13 000

55 374

39 240

(16)

69 000

farms with negative farm

cash income

(8)

(14)

farm business profit

–6 669

–82 220

(10)

–86 800

–5 755

–50 920

(12)

16 800

farms with negative farm

business profit

(2)

(3)

profit at full equity

–excl. capital appreciation

18 665

–46 570

(17)

–55 100

18 240

–28 250

(21)

33 200

–incl. capital appreciation

122 238

108 560

(34)

98 896

165 580

(23)

farm capital at 30 june a

2 745 199

3 122 500

(4)

2 619 209

2 558 170

(5)

net capital additions

25 088

5 720

(342)

24 416

–10 490

(141)

farm debt at 30 june b

278 869

400 380

(8)

214 808

220 820

(9)

equity at 30 june bc

2 454 784

2 747 950

(4)

2 392 419

2 268 640

(5)

equity ratio bd

(2)

(1)

harvest loans at 30 june e

3 083

220

(85)

4 423

370

(49)

farm liquid assets at 30 june b

147 657

66 710

(14)

72 439

66 690

(12)

farm management deposits

(fmds) at 30 june b

16 508

14 990

(25)

19 520

22 320

(18)

share of farms with fmds

at 30 june b

(21)

(15)

rate of return g

– excl. capital appreciation

0.7

–1.5

(18)

–1.9

0.7

–1.2

(20)

1.2

– incl. capital appreciation

4.7

3.6

(34)

3.9

6.9

(24)

off–farm income of owner

manager and spouse b

32 359

29 010

(11)

31 369

35 080

(13)

queensland

western australia

2005–06

2006–07 p

2007–08 s

2005–06

2006–07 p

2007–08 s

total cash receipts

388 347

332 900

(5)

328 900

472 220

476 630

(7)

521 400

total cash costs

289 018

288 780

(6)

221 300

401 309

378 550

(7)

351 700

farm cash income

99 329

44 130

(24)

107 600

70 911

98 090

(23)

169 700

farms with negative farm

cash income

(11)

(14)

farm business profit

– 5 910

– 7 030

(165)

134 700

– 24 215

– 25 960

(93)

55 900

farms with negative farm

business profit

(3)

(6)

profit at full equity

– excl. capital appreciation

32 701

39 010

(32)

171 000

25 326

36 510

(62)

103 400

– incl. capital appreciation

384 255

628 750

(11)

516 765

463 450

(23)

farm capital at 30 june a

4 338 442

5 189 920

(5)

4 258 681

4 692 810

(8)

net capital additions

30 552

62 160

(127)

48 721

51 390

(87)

farm debt at 30 june b

467 011

579 230

(9)

570 205

777 350

(10)

equity at 30 june bc

3 853 949

4 266 020

(5)

3 662 469

3 739 430

(10)

equity ratio bd

(1)

(3)

harvest loans at 30 june e

1 021

(–)

60 800

30 490

(28)

farm liquid assets at 30 june b

98 008

81 930

(15)

208 178

96 550

(22)

farm management deposits

(fmds) at 30 june b

25 419

28 080

(18)

26 019

31 190

(32)

share of farms with fmds

at 30 june b

(14)

(21)

rate of return g

– excl. capital appreciation

0.8

0.9

(30)

3.4

0.7

0.9

(61)

2.4

– incl. capital appreciation

9.7

13.8

(11)

13.9

10.9

(21)

off–farm income of owner

manager and spouse b

26 674

32 230

(11)

42 862

14 640

(13)

south australia

tasmania

2005–06

2006–07 p

2007–08 s

2005–06

2006–07 p

2007–08 s

total cash receipts

323 956

276 050

(7)

325 800

266 833

256 840

(23)

191 900

total cash costs

265 014

228 670

(7)

200 900

195 977

245 820

(23)

170 700

farm cash income

58 942

47 380

(24)

124 900

70 856

11 020

(220)

21 300

farms with negative farm

cash income

(12)

(23)

farm business profit

– 13 644

– 63 230

(19)

39 800

14 783

– 54 920

(40)

– 46 400

farms with negative farm

business profit

(5)

(8)

profit at full equity

– excl. capital appreciation

14 742

– 33 250

(35)

64 800

37 820

– 29 360

(73)

– 26 600

– incl. capital appreciation

68 768

75 560

(52)

121 145

184 780

(51)

farm capital at 1 july a

3 091 224

3 093 820

(5)

2 998 912

3 417 540

(22)

net capital additions

70 984

62 310

(46)

– 20 957

126 800

(64)

farm debt at 30 june b

305 929

330 790

(10)

274 392

376 450

(35)

equity at 30 june bc

2 777 566

2 695 600

(6)

2 721 440

2 891 010

(27)

equity ratio bd

(1)

(4)

harvest loans at 30 june e

11 697

2 820

(39)

(–)

farm liquid assets at 30 june b

136 391

124 180

(16)

120 320

104 970

(43)

farm management deposits

(fmds) at 30 june b

29 804

27 610

(29)

19 686

27 990

(58)

share of farms with fmds

at 30 june b

(30)

(43)

rate of return g

– excl. capital appreciation

0.5

–1.1

(37)

2.3

1.3

–0.9

(76)

–0.9

– incl. capital appreciation

2.3

2.5

(52)

4.1

(47)

off–farm income of owner

manager and spouse b

30 116

19 630

(11)

28 214

23 640

(21)

northern territory

australia

2005–06

2006–07 p

2007–08 s

2005–06

2006–07 p

2007–08 s

total cash receipts

1 635 182

1 545 350

(19)

2 497 539

336 171

292 083

(3)

295 294

total cash costs

1 098 165

1 511 735

(20)

1 779 866

265 989

250 899

(3)

217 117

farm cash income